USC | Damian Williams | Stanley Havili | Joe McKnight | David Ausberry | Brice Butler |
6-1, 195, Jr | 6-1, 230, Jr | 6-0, 190, Jr | 6-4, 235, Jr | 6-3, 200, Fr | |
34-525-3 | 14-207-0 | 12-101-0 | 10-106-0 | 8-130-1 | |
OREGON | Ed Dickson | Jeff Maehl | DJ Davis | David Paulson | Jamere Holland |
6-5,243, Sr | 6-1,175, Jr | 6-1, 205, Jr | 6-4,233, So | 6-1, 188. Jr | |
27-362-4 | 21-252-1 | 10-114-1 | 9-142-0 | 7-105-0 |
The breakdown of TD's is that USC has scored 18 TD's rushing and 8 receiving, whereas Oregon has scored 19 rushing to 6 receiving.
What does all this mean Verne?
It means that USC's Williams gets the lion's share of the catches with 34, with everyone else taking up 42 catches between 4 players. It also means the Oregon's receivers are more tandum in that Dickson and Maehl are near the same in number of catches but like USC they drop off from there, but not as much as USC. Dickson and Maehl account for 48 catches while the other three have only 26.
Part of that is simply because of the make up of the two teams. Both teams have excellent receivers and while I don't at the moment have any stats for yards after the catch, it would appear that the bottom four for USC, while having much fewer catches have either 10 yards per catch or nearly so. The same could be said about the bottom three for Oregon and in fact their per catch seems to be a little better.
Advantage here seems nil, though I would think that if the conditions are right both Williams and Dickson may have a big day.
Now, let's look at the DB's and for a lot of reasons, this is the core of both USC and Oregon's defense. This is the same set up as with the receivers and the bottom stats are Tackles-Sacks-Int's.
CB | FS | SS | CB | |
USC | Kevin Thomas | Taylor Mays | Will Harris | Josh Pinkard |
6-1, 190, Sr | 6-3, 235, Sr | 6-1, 210, Sr | 6-1, 215, Sr | |
31-1-0 | 49-0-1 | 28-2-0 | 24-1-1 | |
LCB | FS | Rover | RCB | |
OREGON | Anthony Gildon | John Boyett | Javes Lewis | T Jackson III |
6-1, 175, So | 5-10,190, Fr | 6-1, 185, So | 5-10,182, Jr | |
5-0-0 | 43-0-2 | 44-0-1 | 26-1.5-2 |
CB | FS | SS | CB | |
USC | TJ Bryant | D. McAllister | ||
6-0, 180, So | 6-1, 195, So | |||
14-.5-0 | 13-0-0 | |||
LCB | FS | Rover | ||
OREGON | Cliff Harris | TJ Ward | Marvin Johnson | |
5-11,160, Fr | 5-11,208,Sr | 5-11.200,Jr | ||
6-0-1 | 16-1-0 | 10-0-0 |
What does all this mean Verne?
What it means is that in the passing game, Oregon's DB's look to be better than USC's while in the run game, USC's DB's look to be better. However, the problem with crowding the line or blitzing with a spread offense is that the DB's have further to run to get to the QB and that gives the QB (in this case Masoli), enough time to burn the D.
On the other hand, if Oregon's front four and LB's don't stop the run, there is a lot of daylight between the LB's and the DB's for them to make some big gains.
The bottom line here is who wins in the trenches. I am of the thought that the trench war will completely dictate the outcome of this game. I also don't see a high scoring game, but then I'm being a little pessimistic too.
All week I've been playing around with Oregon 29 - USC 19 and today I think I am going to stick with that. If the Ducks get the first TD, Chip Kelly will go for two. The way I see the game is this:
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Total | |
USC | 3 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 19 |
OREGON | 0 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 29 |
Tomorrow I will post a listing of what all predictions I can find and then it will be GAME ON!
Till then, be safe.
NOTE: Fixed score.
2 comments :
Your Final scores and line score don't match the teams. Is it Oregon 29 or USC 29?
Fix the score line, no one wants to see a USC victory ;)
Post a Comment