Here are the updated stats to include the Fuskies performance yesterday:
Ducks | Huskies | Ducks | Huskies | |
Rushing Offense | 20 | 95 | 1 | 0 |
Passing Offense | 112 | 38 | 0 | 1 |
Total Offense | 71 | 73 | 1 | 0 |
Scoring Offense | 28 | 76 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing Defense | 39 | 86 | 1 | 0 |
Pass Efficiency Defense | 9 | 106 | 1 | 0 |
Total Defense | 16 | 106 | 1 | 0 |
Scoring Defense | 22 | 87 | 1 | 0 |
Net Punting | 87 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
Punt Returns | 32 | 31 | 0 | 1 |
Kickoff Returns | 5 | 112 | 1 | 0 |
Turnover Margin | 43 | 60 | 1 | 0 |
Pass Defense | 17 | 110 | 1 | 0 |
Passing Efficiency | 74 | 64 | 0 | 1 |
Sacks | 12 | 99 | 1 | 0 |
Tackles For Loss | 28 | 77 | 1 | 0 |
Sacks Allowed | 47 | 72 | 1 | 0 |
13 | 4 |
As you can see, not much changed, in the Ducks vs Fuskies numbers, however there were some degradations from the Fuskies:
The big difference was in punt returns were they dropped from 8th to 31st.
The Fuskies D was so porous last night I think the South Eugene Axemen could have run up 300 yards rushing. Even worse, I think the Axemen could have passed for another 300 yards against this new vaunted D.
Assuming the Ducks don't beat themselves next week, I fear Oregon is going to totally deflate the Fuskies hopes of any kind of competitive bowl for this year.
An another note, I wasn't much impressed with USC either.
No comments :
Post a Comment