Ohio State | |||
09/05/09 | NAVY | 31 - 27 | W |
09/12/09 | USC | 15 - 18 | L |
09/19/09 | @ Toledo ^ | 38 - 0 | W |
09/26/09 | ILLINOIS | 30 - 0 | W |
10/03/09 | @ Indiana * | 33 - 14 | W |
10/10/09 | WISCONSIN | 31 - 13 | W |
10/17/09 | @ Purdue | 18 - 26 | L |
10/24/09 | MINNESOTA | 38 - 7 | W |
10/31/09 | NEW MEXICO ST. | 45 - 0 | W |
11/07/09 | @ Penn St. | 24 - 7 | W |
11/14/09 | IOWA | 27 - 24 | W OT |
11/21/09 | @ Michigan | 21 - 10 | W |
Oregon | |||
09/03/09 | @ Boise St. * | 8-19 | L |
09/12/09 | PURDUE * | 38 - 36 | W |
09/19/09 | UTAH | 31 - 24 | W |
09/26/09 | CALIFORNIA | 42 - 3 | W |
10/03/09 | WASHINGTON ST. | 52 - 6 | W |
10/10/09 | @ UCLA | 24 - 10 | W |
10/24/09 | @ Washington | 43 - 19 | W |
10/31/09 | USC | 47 - 20 | W |
11/07/09 | @ Stanford | 42 - 51 | L |
11/14/09 | ARIZONA ST. | 44 - 21 | W |
11/21/09 | @ Arizona | 44 - 41 | W 2OT |
12/03/09 | OREGON ST. * | 37 - 33 | W |
Overall | Overall | ||||
Oregon | O Ranking | D Ranking | |||
09/03/09 | @ No. 14 Boise State | 0-1 (0-0) | L 19-8 | 8 | 13 |
09/12/09 | Purdue | 1-1 (0-0) | W 38-36 | 53 | 68 |
09/19/09 | No. 18 Utah | 2-1 (0-0) | W 31-24 | 54 | 20 |
09/26/09 | No. 6 California | 3-1 (1-0) | W 42-3 | 46 | 70 |
10/03/09 | Washington State | 4-1 (2-0) | W 52-6 | 119 | 120 |
10/10/09 | @ UCLA | 5-1 (3-0) | W 24-10 | 88 | 39 |
10/24/09 | @ Washington | 6-1 (4-0) | W 43-19 | 63 | 79 |
10/31/09 | No. 5 USC | 7-1 (5-0) | W 47-20 | 58 | 43 |
11/07/09 | @ Stanford | 7-2 (5-1) | L 51-42 | 13 | 85 |
11/14/09 | Arizona State | 8-2 (6-1) | W 44-21 | 91 | 12 |
11/21/09 | @ Arizona | 9-2 (7-1) | W 44-41 OT | 40 | 21 |
12/03/09 | No. 16 Oregon State | 10-2 (8-1) | W 37-33 | 28 | 50 |
55.08 | 51.67 | ||||
Ohio State | |||||
09/05/09 | Navy | 1-0 (0-0) | W 31-27 | 84 | 36 |
09/12/09 | No. 3 USC | 1-1 (0-0) | L 18-15 | 58 | 43 |
09/19/09 | @ Toledo | 2-1 (0-0) | W 38-0 | 16 | 96 |
09/26/09 | Illinois | 3-1 (1-0) | W 30-0 | 50 | 91 |
10/03/09 | @ Indiana | 4-1 (2-0) | W 33-14 | 70 | 89 |
10/10/09 | Wisconsin | 5-1 (3-0) | W 31-13 | 34 | 18 |
10/17/09 | @ Purdue | 5-2 (3-1) | L 26-18 | 53 | 68 |
10/24/09 | Minnesota | 6-2 (4-1) | W 38-7 | 113 | 61 |
10/31/09 | New Mexico State | 7-2 (4-1) | W 45-0 | 120 | 104 |
11/07/09 | @ No. 11 Penn State | 8-2 (5-1) | W 24-7 | 36 | 8 |
11/14/09 | No. 10 Iowa | 9-2 (6-1) | W 27-24 OT | 93 | 11 |
11/21/09 | @ Michigan | 10-2 (7-1) | W 21-10 | 59 | 81 |
65.5 | 58.83 |
The inverse of the above is that part of the reason tOSU's D looks so good statistically is because they didn't face offensive juggernauts. Granted the Ducks faced Washington State, but tOSU faced two offenses in the 100's (Minnesota and NM State).
Maybe more telling, tOSU faced passing offenses that ranked an average of 68 and rushing offenses that ranked 54, whereas Oregon faced passing offenses that averaged 51 and 60 respectively. One could argue that tOSU's D numbers should be higher and that would be true if their D was as good as advertised in the number 5 slot. However, because the Ducks faced superior offenses, their D ranking of 32 is quite respectable.
Even more telling, tOSU faced rushing defenses that averaged 62 while Oregon faced rushing D's that averaged 52. tOSU should have higher rushing offensive numbers, but alas they do not, still being ranked 19th isn't too bad. On the other hand the difference between facing an average of 52 rushing D and having a rushing O of 6 is way more impressive. For you number crunchers, the difference is tOSU 46 and Oregon 43 spots and the difference between the two rushing offenses is Oregon +37 yards per game.
What does all this mean?
Pretty much, what I've been saying since the first blog, tOSU's defense looks good because they simply didn't face the offensive units that should have challenged their defense. Had the Bucks faced offenses like Oregon did, and I dare say their numbers would much higher - just like Oregon's are. On the other hand, had the Ducks faced offenses like tOSU did, their numbers would be lower.
On the other side of the ball, Oregon faced stouter defenses on the whole than what tOSU did. Again this is telling in that had tOSU faced the type of defenses that Oregon did, their offensive numbers would be lower. The complete opposite would be true for the Ducks, for had they faced the lesser defenses that tOSU did, the Duck offensive numbers would be higher.
All in all, tOSU fans argue that the Ducks have never faced a defense like tOSU's. However, the numbers just don't agree and in fact the numbers indicate that the Oregon D should be enough to contain some of the tOSU offense. The other side wouldn't be true in that the numbers indicate that the Buck D won't be able to contain the Duck O.
Time to start looking at predictions and at this point I'm going to say that both teams would be equal in the passing game, but in the rushing game it looks like maybe the Ducks will prevail.
Ducks: 43
Bucks: 28
2 comments :
Bob, I like your score. I don't like the numbers but how else can you prognosticate. Let's just prove it on the field. Chip will have the guys ready.
btw - just visited Flagstaff for the first time in my life. Down for AZ game, what a great area you are in.
Nice information! I was wondering if it is my cp or if it is something else but, I seem to lose part of the right edge of the main page. The O rankings on this page are hidden behind the right side of the blog. I have this happen on some of your stuff. Keep up the good work!
Post a Comment