Monday, December 14, 2009

Oregon v Ohio State - A Tale of Two Stories - Part 6 - LB's

Today, I am going to look just at the LB's and here they are, both starters and reserves (I added the reserves because they tend to make an impact):


SAM
MIKE
WILL
Oregon
Eddie Pleasant
Casey Matthews
Spencer Paysinger


5-11,207,So
6-2,235,Jr
6-3,226,Jr
Reserves
Bryson Littlejohn
Kiko Alonso
Michael Clay


6-1,227,Jr
6-4,225,RFr
5-11,209,Fr







SAM
MIKE
WILL
Ohio State
Austin Spitler
Brian Rolle
Ross Homan


6-3,234,Sr
5-11,221,Jr
6-0,229,Jr
Reserves
Etienne Sabino
Storm Klein
Tony Jackson


6-3,232,So
5-11,227,So
6-3,225,Fr
And now let's look at what they contributed:

Ducks
Pleasant
Matthews
Paysinger
LittleJohn
Alonso
Clay
Totals
Tackles
50
72
72
9
15
30
248
TFLs
7
4
6.5
0
1
1
19.5
Sacks
4.5
2.5
1
0
0
1
9
Ints
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
BrUp
4
4
6.5
0
0
2
16.5
FF or FR
3
0
2
0
1
0
6
Block Kick
0
0
0
0
0
0
0








Bucks
Spitler
Rolle
Homan
Sabino
Klein
Jackson
Totals
Tackles
38
91
96
6
10
1
242
TFLs
5
7
5
0.5
0
0
17.5
Sacks
1
0
2
0.5
0
0
3.5
Ints
1
1
4
0
0
0
6
BrUp
0
0
5
0
0
0
5
FF or FR
0
1
3
0
0
0
4
Block Kick
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
From a size standpoint, but squads match up quite equally.  Both squads have one 5-11 player and the other two being over 6 foot.  I am not sure I can give an advantage to either squad based on size alone.

Now for how they performed and the very first thing that pops out to me is that the starters for tOSU seem probably play the entire game and the Ducks do more rotation.  Howe did I come about this you ask?  Well if you look just at the starting three for each squad, you'll notice that the Ducks had 194 tackles compared to the Bucks 225.  Also notice that the reserves for the Bucks only accounted for 17 tackles compared to the Ducks reserves accounting for 54 tackles.

So what does this mean?  I would garner the argument that in the 4th quarter, the Duck LB's are going to be a little fresher on the legs, just a little.

As to the other stats, I was surprised that the only category that the Bucks lead is in the number of Ints they've snatched.  However, having said that, the differences are not that much except for the number of sacks and breakups.

Again, what does this mean?

I am going to go out on a limb here and suggest that the Duck LB's are more mobile than the Buck LB's and I make that suggestion based on a couple of things here.  First is the sacks and TFL's, which means that the Duck LB's can and do get into the backfield.  Not that the Bucks don't either, it's just that with the higher quality and more mobile of QB's in the P10, the Ducks had more success at getting to their objective.  Second, the number of break ups is far and away more dominate with the Ducks, which would also indicate that on one play they are in the backfield and in the next (because it's now 3rd and long) play, they are defending the pass.

This is not saying that tOSU LB's aren't dominate, just that they faced offenses that may have not been as good as what the Ducks faced.  Case in point, tOSU didn't face an offense in the B10 ranked better than 34th in the nation with only two teams in the top 50.  The Ducks faced in the P10 a top 25 team, 2 top 30 teams and 4 top 50 teams.  I will get into the schedules on another day.

Suffice it to say, that these two squads match up very very well, however based on the numbers and the utilization of reserves, I would have to give the nod to the Ducks - but just barely.

3 comments :

joe56219 said...

If t-osu faced weaker offenses, wouldn't their sacks and breakup numbers be higher?

Bob said...

tOSU's numbers would be higher on D if their D was better than what it is. I am thinking that tOSU's LB's are not any better than the Ducks and if you compare the offenses played, the Ducks would come out better.

If tOSU had played Oregon's schedule and vice versa, then I am thinking that the Duck LB's would have much higher numbers and the Bucks - not so much.

Clear as mud?

Anonymous said...

"If t-osu faced weaker offenses, wouldn't their sacks and breakup numbers be higher?"

Not necessarily... facing a mediocre offense doesn't make you're defense outstanding by necessity. Think incomplete passes and the like. In addition, this is only LB corps, if OSU's D line is facing weak offenses, its going to be the culprit of the failure of most failed run plays by opposing offenses, not the linebackers.