Friday, December 11, 2009

Oregon v Ohio State - A Tale of Two Stories - Part 5 Receivers/DB's

Today we'll look at the matchups between the receivers and the DB's.

First, let's look at the lineups, I've added all the backups since they may account for a substantial amount of stats and to account for injuries.  Stats are as follows for receivers (rec/yards/avg) and for DB's (tackles/ints/sacks).



WR
WR
TE


Ohio State
Devier Posey
Dane Sanzenbacher
Jake Ballard


6-3,205,So
5-11,175,Jr
6-6,256,Sr

Stats
52/727/14
27/506/18.7
13/126/9.7






Reserves\
Duron Carter
Ray Small
Jake Stoneburner


6-2,190,Fr
5-11,180,Sr
6-5,230,RFr

Stats
13/176/13.5
15/175/11.7
2/30/15







LCB
FS
ROV
RCB
Oregon
Cliff Harris
TJ Ward
Javes Lewis
T Jackson III

5-11,160,Fr
5-11,208,Sr
6-1,185,So
5-10,182,Jr
Stats
16/1/0
58/1/0
77/2/2
46/4/0





Reserves\
Anthony Gildon
John Boyett
Marvin Johnson
Chad Peppers

6-1,175,So
5-10,190,RFr
5-11,200,Jr
5-10,179,Jr
Stats
5/0/0
78/2/0
24/0/0
3/0/0
The first thing that strikes me is that the Bucks TE's only accounted for a total of 15 receptions for the entire year which would only be an average of just over a reception per game.  One could infer from this that the TE's are used for the run game or when used as a receivers out of the slot.  When one considers that tOSU is ranked 106th in the nation and 11 out of 11 in the B10 in passing yards, the receivers are not utilized as much as other teams.  However, having said this, the receiving corps accounted for 17 TD's for the season verses the run game's 20 TD's.  Sounds pretty balanced to me from that single standpoint.

As far as the Oregon DB's are concerned, from the high number of tackles being made by the secondary means just that, teams are getting into the secondary on Oregon.  If you are a running team against the Ducks, this should bode well (as in tOSU) for putting up some serious yards on the ground.  However and again having said all this, the Ducks are 38th in run defense at about 127 yards per game.  This would indicate that even though teams are getting into the secondary, they aren't getting very far.

Now for the flip side, we'll look at the Ducks receivers verses those potent tOSU DB's.



WR
WR
TE


Oregon
Jeff Maehl
Lavasier Tuinei
Ed Dickson


6-1,175,Jr
6-5,200,So
6-5,243,Sr

Stats
52/686/13.2
22/187/8.5
42/551/13.1






Reserves\
DJ Davis
Jamere Holland
David Paulson


6-1,205,Jr
6-1,185,Jr
6-4,233,So

Stats
22/230/10.5
13/199/15.3
12/185/15.4






Ohio State
FS
SS
CB
CB

Anderson Russell
Kurt Coleman
Devon Torrence
Chimdi Chekwa

6-0,205,5th
5-11,188,Sr
6-1,193,Jr
6-0,188,Jr
Stats
43/3/0
64/5/1
33/2/1
43/1/0





Reserves\
Jaermale Hines
Orhian Johnson
Andre Amos
Travis Howard

6-2,210,Jr
6-2,178,RFr
6-1,183,Sr
6-1,180,RFr
Stats
56/2/1
9/0/0
12/0/0
2/0/0
The first thing that jumps out to me here is the number of Int's tOSU backs have achieved over the course of the year.  All in all, tOSU has accounted for 23 Int's or almost two a game.  So at first blush one would think that tOSU's DB's are ball hawkers, however, of those 23 Ints, the DB's have only accounted for 13 Ints, which means that other team members have accounted for the other 10..  The Ducks managed just 10 on the year, of course our best DB's have been out most of the year as in all world WT3 and his backup Glasper.

Let's take a look at the stats by themselves:

Ohio State
Rec
Yrds
Avg

122
1740
14.26
Oregon
Tackles
Ints
Sacks

307
10
2




Oregon
Rec
Yrds
Avg

163
2038
12.5
Ohio State
Tackles
Ints
Sacks

262
13
2
Considering that the Ducks utilize their TE's far more in the receiving corps, it would appear that tOSU tends to have more +20 yard catches since their average is a little higher than the Ducks.  All in all I would say that both units match up very well with their counterparts.

What does all this mean?

It means that chances are as far as the passing game is concerning, it may come down to the big play and who has the most of them.  Both DB units match up very well against their respective receiving corps and we'll learn more as we look at the LB's tomorrow.

At this juncture in the analysis, I am thinking that it will all come down to the LB's.

4 comments :

Anonymous said...

Good work on the blogs bob..!!

GO DUCKS

Bob said...

Thanks

Kurt said...

Actually, the Oregon secondary racks up a lot of tackles because of the type of defensive scheme they run, where coaches set it up for the secondary to play an active role at the line of scrimmage in run support. Every year the Oregon secondary has an abnormally large number of tackles, at least once a CB has actually led the team in tackles.

Anonymous said...

To go along with what Kurt wrote, our linebackers are fast enuf to cover 1 on 1 and they do, probably as much as any other defense in America. This allows the secondary to blitz and vary the defense in a great variety of ways. Therefore, tho' I really appreciate your post, it is nearly impossible to quantify by position the 'team effect' and balance of the Oregon defense, IMO.